Recording Now Available: CTTI Webinar Unveiling New Recommendations on Embedding Clinical Trials into Clinical Practice

A recording of CTTI’s December 15 webinar unveiling the new recommendations on embedding clinical trials into clinical practice is now available. 

The one-hour webinar includes a welcome from Sally Okun, CTTI Executive Director; a keynote
presentation from Robert M. Califf, U.S. Food & Drug Administration; a project overview from Matthew Roe, AstraZeneca; and a panel discussion moderated by Lindsay Kehoe, CTTI Senior Project Manager. The panel discussion, which focused on stakeholder perspectives related to the
integration of the new recommendations, included: Sam Bozzette, National Institutes of Health;
Lara Jehi, Cleveland Clinic; Holly Robertson, Medidata; and Alandra Weaver, Crohn’s & Colitis
Foundation. 

The goal of creating these recommendations for embedding elements of clinical trials into care is to reduce trial inefficiencies and enable faster, more representative, evidence generation that improves patient care. The recommendations were developed for trials of drugs, devices, and biologics in close collaboration with stakeholders across the clinical trials enterprise. The first phase involved gathering input through qualitative, in-depth interviews with designers and implementers of interventional clinical trials that are embedded into clinical practice. The recommendations were drafted and refined with input from a multi-stakeholder project team and through Expert Meetings. 

View the slide deck to read more. 

CTTI Unveils New Recommendations for Embedding Clinical Trials into Clinical Practice

 

 

CTTI today released new recommendations for embedding clinical trials into clinical practice. The goal is to have care inform research and research inform care, which will enable higher quality, more efficient, and more representative evidence for care. When clinical trials have elements embedded into health care delivery, the trials are more accessible to patients, can be conducted in close alignment with clinical workflows, and may use existing infrastructure and data sources for research. This is in contrast to the status quo where research data is collected separately from a clinical care setting, and may therefore produce results that do not reflect the real-world performance of medical products in the populations that will use them.

“We hope that by creating these recommendations for embedding elements of clinical trials into clinical practice, we can reduce trial inefficiencies and enable faster, more representative, evidence generation that improves patient care,” said Lindsay Kehoe, CTTI Senior Project Manager. “Higher quality, safer, more efficient care benefits everyone.”

The case for embedding elements of clinical trials into clinical practice is clear: we have inadequate evidence for care, lack of representativeness of most Americans and health care settings, and an underperforming emergency response mechanism for national health crises. By facilitating the integration of randomized, interventional trial elements into clinical care, we may create efficiencies that help provide much needed evidence faster. Elements that can be embedded include eligibility and patient identification, informed consent, randomization, intervention, trial data acquisition, and evidence integration.

The recommendations were developed for trials of drugs, devices, and biologics in close collaboration with stakeholders across the clinical trials enterprise. The first phase involved gathering input through qualitative, in-depth interviews with designers and implementers of interventional clinical trials that are embedded into clinical practice. The recommendations were drafted and refined with input from a multi-stakeholder project team and through Expert Meetings.

More information on the Trials in Clinical Practice project can be found on CTTI’s website.

CTTI to Launch New Recommendations for Embedding Clinical Trials into Clinical Practice

CTTI will host a free public webinar on Thurs., Dec. 15 to unveil new recommendations for embedding clinical trials into clinical practice.  

The webinar will include a welcome from Sally Okun, CTTI Executive Director; a keynote
presentation from a special guest with the FDA; a project overview from Matthew Roe,
AstraZeneca; and a panel discussion moderated by Lindsay Kehoe, CTTI Senior Project
Manager. The panel discussion, which will focus on stakeholder perspectives related to the
integration of the new recommendations, includes: Sam Bozzette, National Institutes of Health;
Lara Jehi, Cleveland Clinic; Holly Robertson, Medidata; and Alandra Weaver, Crohn’s & Colitis
Foundation. 

Embedding elements of clinical trials, such as randomization, administration of study drug, and
data acquisition, into routine care reduces duplication of trial and care activities and promotes the
development of a learning health care system. This will naturally lead to better decision-making,
treatment options, and outcomes for patients. 

However, integrating interventional clinical trials into health care settings is challenging and
complex, and operational direction is needed. As part of the Trials in Clinical Practice project,
CTTI has conducted in-depth interviews with study designers and implementers, gathered case
examples, and is now ready to share the recommendations it’s created to facilitate the integration
of randomized, interventional trial elements into clinical care; including, but not limited to, trials of
drugs, devices, and biologics intended for regulatory review. 

The free 60-minute webinar will begin at 12:00pm EST and registration is not required. 

CTTI Conducting Survey on Registering and Reporting Clinical Trial Information on ClinicalTrials.gov

The ClinicalTrials.gov Reporting Challenges Project is conducting a survey following in-depth interviews that were conducted in late 2021. We invite individuals who provide oversight, register, and/or report trial results information on ClinicalTrials.gov to complete the survey. You may also forward this survey to others who you know register and/or report clinical trial information on ClinicalTrials.gov.  

Additional information for potential survey participants is provided below. 

What are you being invited to do?  

CTTI is conducting a survey to learn more about organizations’ experiences with registering and reporting clinical trial information on ClinicalTrials.gov. 

We invite individuals at organizations such as academic institutions, medical product companies, government agencies, and non-government organizations who provide oversight, register, and/or report trial results information on ClinicalTrials.gov to complete the survey.  

The survey focuses on policies and approaches your organization implements to comply with ClinicalTrials.gov regulatory requirements, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of your approaches, challenges faced, and suggested strategies for addressing challenges. 

How will CTTI use the information? 

CTTI will outline useful practices for improving the reporting of timely, accurate, and complete registration and results information on ClinicalTrials.gov.  

Your name and organization will not be included when CTTI reports the survey findings. CTTI will send the FDA an aggregated summary of survey findings to inform their approach to supporting more complete reporting of clinical trial information. 

Interested in participating? 

If you provide oversight, register, and/or report clinical trial information on ClinicalTrials.gov, please click on this link to take the survey.

You may also forward this survey to others who you know register and/or report clinical trial information on ClinicalTrials.gov. 

Have questions? 

For questions about this survey, please email CTTI Project Manager Kelly Franzetti.

CTTI Holds Meeting to Discuss Conducting Trials as Part of Clinical Practice

The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) held a multi-stakeholder Expert Meeting on September 21 to discuss embedding aspects or elements of trials into clinical practice. The goal is to have care inform research and research inform care, therefore, CTTI created a set of recommendations to facilitate the integration of randomized, interventional trial elements into clinical care. Although trials and key initiatives are already paving the way, including the ACTIV-6 Study, the RECOVERY Trial, the Coalition for Advancing Clinical Trials at the Point of Care (ACT@POC), and the National Patient-centered Outcomes Research Network (PCORnet), challenges remain in driving change and measuring the impact of this change. At the Trials in Clinical Practice Expert Meeting, held in Washington, D.C., participants identified pain points of embedding trial elements, shared how CTTI recommendations can overcome those pain points, and brainstormed ways to measure implementation of the recommendations.  

Dr. Janet Woodcock, Principal Deputy Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, reiterated the imperatives for conducting trials as part of clinical practice, indicating that we have inadequate evidence for care, lack of representativeness of most Americans and health care settings, and an underperforming emergency response mechanism for national health crises. 

Meeting attendees identified some important themes: 

  • The ability to embed aspects of a trial (eligibility and patient identification, informed consent, randomization, intervention, trial data acquisition, and evidence integration) will depend on a variety of factors:  
    • Aligning trial design with clinical workflow to minimize provider and patient burden 
    • Ensuring site readiness with appropriately trained staff and technology resources 
    • Defining clear channels of accountability 
    • Raising awareness of the value of research and its subsequent impact on care.  
  • Technology and reusable networks can help overcome some of the barriers, as can changes in culture and policy and good partnerships with patient groups, health system leaders, and IT leaders. 
  • CTTI recommendations provide design and operational clarity to embed trial elements, but their adoption will require engagement with health care providers, technology support, and ways to measure progress. 

Meeting attendees also discussed how to measure whether adoption of CTTI Trials in Clinical Practice recommendations is improving the quality and efficiency of trials.  

Initial themes fell into two camps:  

  1. Measures of progress in clinical trial quality 
  2. Measures of progress towards a learning health care system.

To assess progress of clinical trial quality, measures might include:  

  • improved enrollment/retention rate 
  • whether trials have enrolled reflective and representative populations that align with those being cared for 
  • participant and health care provider satisfaction/experience with research.  

To assess progress at the learning health system level, measures might include: 

  • whether embedded trials are producing impactful, reliable results that are integrated into clinical decision making 
  • the proportion of practices in the health care ecosystem that are involved in research 
  • changes in reimbursement policies 
  • involvement of medical journals that report on elements embedded into care. 

CTTI Welcomes Four New Members to its Executive Committee

Today, CTTI welcomed four new members to its Executive Committee, which is responsible for making decisions about the overall direction and strategy for the organization. The new Executive Committee members, whose three-year term runs from 2022-2025, include: 

  • Barbara Bierer, The Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard 
  • Michael Cuffe, HCA Healthcare 
  • Esther Krofah, FasterCures, of the Milken Institute 
  • Virginia Nido, Roche Genentech

“CTTI is honored to welcome this impressive group of leaders from across the clinical trials enterprise to our Executive Committee,” said Sally Okun, CTTI Executive Director. “From medicine to health care to public policy to pharma, these four new EC members will play an important role in helping CTTI achieve our goals to transform clinical trials by 2030.” 

“The distinguished and diverse new Executive Committee members will bring a unique combination of expertise, talent and dedication to advance CTTI’s mission,” said CTTI Executive Committee Chair Mark McClellan. “We are looking forward to the valuable perspectives and shared commitment they each bring to our efforts to improve and transform clinical trials.” 

The 14-member Executive Committee, chaired by McClellan, and co-chaired by Khair ElZarrad (FDA) and John Alexander (Duke University), includes distinguished U.S. and international thought leaders in government, academia, industry, and patient advocacy who are experienced at envisioning and facilitating improvements in health care and medical research systems. This group ensures that CTTI informs and facilitates meaningful improvements to the design and conduct of clinical trials.  

The Executive Committee members whose terms continue are: Donna R. Cryer, Global Liver Institute; Pat Furlong, Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy; Patricia Hurley, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Theodore Lystig, BridgeBio; Robert Temple, FDA; Spiros Vamvakas, European Medicines Agency; and Bram Zuckerman, FDA.  

CTTI also wishes to express sincere gratitude to its outgoing Executive Committee members for their 12 years of collective service from 2019-2022: Steven Galson, Amgen; Michael Kolodziej, ADVI Health; Rod MacKenzie, Pfizer; and Pierre Meulien, Innovative Health Initiative. 

New Executive Committee Members

FDA, CTTI Accepting Applications for Patient Engagement Collaborative (PEC)

The FDA and CTTI are currently accepting applications from patient advocates interested in becoming members of the Patient Engagement Collaborative (PEC). The PEC is an ongoing, collaborative forum where patient community representatives and regulators come together to discuss strategies for increasing patient engagement in medical product development and regulatory discussions at the FDA.

Applicants will be selected based on their ability to meaningfully contribute to the PEC, represent and express the patient voice for their constituency, work in a constructive manner with involved stakeholders, and understand and navigate the clinical research ecosystem.

Successful applicants will include:

  • Patients who have personal disease experience
  • Caregivers who support patients (e.g., a family member or friend) and have personal disease experience through this caregiver role
  • Representatives from patient groups who, through their role in the patient group, have direct or indirect disease experience

PEC members participate in working meetings two to four times per year, either in person (in the Washington D.C. area) or virtually. Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, meetings will be conducted virtually and may resume in-person when it is safe to do so. Additionally, PEC members participate in monthly one-hour teleconferences and other meetings may be organized as needed.

A maximum of 75 applicants will be considered for PEC membership and up to eight members will be selected. Interested applicants are encouraged to complete and submit the online form starting at 10:00 a.m. EDT on September 19, 2022. The application will remain open until 75 completed applications have been submitted. Those who are unable to submit an application electronically are encouraged to call the FDA’s Office of Patient Affairs at 301-796-8460 to arrange for a mail submission.

Please review the related Federal Register notice for important information about the application process.

 

 

New CTTI Publication Investigates Best Practices for Driving Adoption of Master Protocols

In a new publication, CTTI applies expertise from industry sponsors, regulatory agencies, patient groups, and academic institutions to identify best practices for driving the widespread adoption of master protocols. Master protocol studies use a single protocol to guide the design and conduct of multiple sub-studies that can answer several questions at once—enabling patient-centric and efficient clinical research. Despite these benefits, adoption of master protocol studies remains limited. To facilitate broader adoption, CTTI conducted a landscape review and collected insights from multi-stakeholder expert meetings. Through these efforts, CTTI identified a broad set changes in the clinical trials ecosystem that would be needed for mainstream adoption master protocol studies: (1) the development of a harmonized global vision, (2) mobilization through the leadership of patients and academic groups, and (3) reinvention of operational processes and partnerships. The full publication, available in Clinical Trials, discusses the barriers to widespread adoption of master protocol studies and details potential solutions. The paper also highlights a suite of tools that CTTI has developed to support the design and conduct of high-quality, efficient master protocol studies.

CTTI Holds Meeting to Discuss Embedding Clinical Trials in Health Care Settings

The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) held a multi-stakeholder Expert Meeting on May 11 to discuss recommendations for embedding elements of clinical trials into routine care. Different elements of clinical trials can be embedded into care, such as randomization, administration of study drug, and data acquisition. While this can promote the development of a learning health care system—where research will inform practice and practice will inform research—achieving this is complicated, and clarity is needed about how to operationalize the integration. Leaders and key stakeholders from across the clinical trials community participated in the meeting to help refine the recommendations and begin to strategize their implementation of them. 

Meeting attendees identified some important themes: 

  • Alignment of research and care is needed. Data collected during routine care should be good enough to support both high quality care and research.  

We would do well to clearly identify the high level of alignment needed for patient care and research.      Researchers need to get less special about themselves. We want to identify consequential decisions, when that decision occurs, why it matters, and when and how will we measure the consequences of that decision. Those three goals are 100% identical between research and care.” – Health Care System Provider

  • We need transparency about roles and responsibilities. Embedding research into care will involve many stakeholders, including investigators, research sponsors, health care providers, regulatory bodies, operational technology providers, clinical research organizations, patient advocacy groups, health system leaders, funders, payers and, of course, patients. 

     “The front-line troops carrying out embedded trials – patients and clinicians – need to see a compelling research question or need that is personally valuable in the context of everything else they are trying to do. Some of that can be done by deep embedding in their environment to understand their needs.” – Funder 

  • There is important work ahead of us. Meeting attendees provided feedback on the set of draft recommendations and suggested new tools to help implement the recommendations such as a decision tree tool to evaluate what trial elements could be embedded, a workflow support tool to clarify the kind of support needed to embed trial elements, and a list of technology examples that have or could enable embedding.  

CTTI is now using these findings—along with other research results and multi-stakeholder discussions—to refine recommendations and develop resources for release in late 2022. The project team will host another expert meeting on this topic in September. 

Recent CTTI Publication Investigates HABP/VABP Risk and Antibiotic Trial Eligibility for Hospitalized Patients in Europe

Topics Included: Safety

A new CTTI publication investigates the prospective identification of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) risk factors and antibiotic trial eligibility among hospitalized, critically ill patients at seven European hospitals. The study, PROPHETIC EU: Prospective Identification of Pneumonia in Hospitalized Patients in the Intensive Care Unit in European and United States Cohorts, published in Open Forum Infectious Diseases, evaluated 888 critically ill patients receiving ventilation or high levels of supportive oxygen and used existing clinical criteria to predict which patients would develop HABP/VABP. The researchers compared these results to those of a prior CTTI study of U.S. patients, finding that a higher proportion of European patients who were treated for possible HABP/VABP met the pneumonia definition compared to their counterparts in U.S. hospitals. The European patients were also more likely to meet common antibiotic trial eligibility criteria. The results could be applied to the development of new strategies to improve registrational trial feasibility and foster the development of much needed new antibacterial treatments for HABP/VABP. 

Resources

filtered content

Refine Your Selection