CTTI and FDA Share Strategies for Improving Timely, Accurate, and Complete Registration and Reporting of Summary Results Information for Applicable Clinical Trials on ClinicalTrials.gov

Timely, accurate, and complete registration and reporting of summary results information for applicable clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov allows access to current research and evidence for all partners in the clinical trials enterprise, including patients, providers, sponsors and investigators, regulators, payers, and health system leaders. Despite the regulatory requirements for applicable clinical trials and the importance of fostering transparency while increasing knowledge of potential new treatments in development, multiple publications have reported gaps in clinical trial registration and results information submission to the data bank.  

To address this issue, the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) collaborated with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on a project to understand the barriers to timely, accurate, and complete registration and reporting of summary results information for applicable clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov. The project involved in-depth interviews and a survey to identify the range of barriers and their salience by type of stakeholder, root causes influencing barriers, and potential solutions and helpful practices to implement moving forward. After the relevant themes were assessed, CTTI surveyed 92 individuals who represented 84 unique organizations and condensed this information into a report containing strategies and recommendations for improving registration and reporting. 

Some of the strategies include: 

  • Use a centralized/dedicated approach to meeting ClinicalTrials.gov requirements  
  • Take a proactive, rather than reactive, approach to complying with ClinicalTrials.gov regulatory requirements 
  • Escalate to upper levels of leadership for PIs/study teams that are non-responsive to the administrative unit’s communication about compliance  
  • Inform PIs/study teams  
    • about the possibility of civil money penalties for non-compliance with ClinicalTrials.gov regulatory requirements;  
    • that submitting results information on ClinicalTrials.gov is separate from publishing results; and 
    • that, per ICMJE, reporting results information on ClinicalTrials.gov does not preclude publishing results in journals 
  • Provide education, resources, guidance, and support about meeting ClinicalTrials.gov requirements to PIs/study teams and other research personnel 

See the full report for a complete list of strategies. 

When describing challenges with registering and reporting summary results information from applicable clinical trials, respondents cited several major challenges: 

  • A lack of understanding on the part of the Principal Investigator (PI) and their study team regarding  
    • the type of trial that must be registered,  
    • which trial results must be submitted,  
    • and when they should be registered.  
  • Administrative groups also reported challenges relating to non-responsive PIs and study teams, which hinders both timely registering and reporting of results.  
  • For reporting, PIs and study teams responding to the survey also expressed concerns about waiting until all data are analyzed before reporting results information on ClinicalTrials.gov to prevent discrepancies between ClinicalTrials.gov data and published results. 

For more information, see CTTI’s Project page: Challenges Meeting U.S. ClinicalTrials.gov Reporting Requirements. 

CTTI Publication Explores Stakeholder Reflections on Implementing the National Institutes of Health’s Policy on Single Institutional Review Boards

A new CTTI publication, published in the Journal of Ethics and Human Research, explores stakeholder reflections on implementing the National Institutes of Health’s policy on single Institutional Review Boards (sIRB). CTTI interviewed 34 stakeholders with various roles in the single IRB process to gather perspectives about their experiences implementing the sIRB model, focusing specifically on the six goals of the NIH sIRB policy. Some stakeholders suggested that using the sIRB model has streamlined and reduced inefficiencies associated with local IRB model. However, new inefficiencies were created due to unclear roles, lack of systems and processes, and increased workloads for some stakeholders. 

These stakeholder responses suggest that standardizing the sIRB process and implementing new systems that support the NIH’s goal for enhancing and streamlining the IRB process are needed. For example, standardizing the roles and responsibilities of reviewing IRBs and relying institutions, improving the compatibility of IRB software, and having a central repository for institutional information may improve the efficiency of the sIRB process. CTTI utilized the findings of these interviews to inform an sIRB evaluation framework.

New CTTI Project to Develop Common Framework to Assess Progress Towards TT2030 Vision

Clinical trials are critical components of the evidence generating system in research. Launched in 2021, CTTI’s Transforming Trials 2030 vision outlines five pillars for how clinical trials should be performed by 2030. This vision establishes that clinical trials need to be patient centered and easily accessible, fully integrated into health processes, designed with a quality approach, maximally leveraging all available data, and improving population health. Currently, the TT2030 vision lacks metrics to demonstrate progress towards the vision’s five central goals. The Measuring Trials Transformation (MTT) Project will develop a common framework to evaluate and assess the progress made towards achieving the five main goals of the TT2030 vision, a framework that can be used to share accountability across the clinical trials enterprise.  

After launching the TT2030 vision, CTTI conducted concept elicitation interviews to develop key concepts metrics should address within each pillar. In 2022 and early 2023, CTTI conducted surveys of experts to assess the value of individual metrics for assessing progress towards the vision. 

To deploy a set of relevant metrics, CTTI will utilize a variety of iterative strategies, including interviews with key stakeholders on their experiences with each pillar and ideas for related metrics, expert surveys on draft measures for each pillar, and an online public forum on the measurement framework. The selected metrics will be further refined by integrating public comment, expert input, and project team feedback and discussions. CTTI will perform a case study using the framework of metrics to measure progress towards the TT2030 vision by collecting and reporting an initial set of metrics using recent clinical trials.   

CTTI understands that some goals of the TT2030 vision will be achieved sooner than others, and so the framework created by the MTT Project will establish key milestones to assess progress made by the program over time. CTTI will use this vision to guide their priorities, and they will encourage others to do the same, facilitating accountability across the entire clinical trials industry.  

The Metrics Framework is currently open for public comment until mid-October 2023. Please view the dashboard and provide your suggestions and feedback here.