New CTTI Recommendations Provide Path for More Efficient Clinical Trials Using Clinical Registries

[yoast-breadcrumb]

CTTI Project: Registry Trials

Newly released recommendations from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) have the potential to streamline clinical trials by using registry information. Registries are data collection tools typically used to better understand long-term trends in a specific population, such as patients with a particular disease or patients exposed to a certain treatment.

PDF icon Download Press Release (194.86 KB)

CTTI Presents Recommendations from the Registry Trials Project

CTTI Project: Registry Trials

PDF icon Download Slides (653.36 KB)

Webinar Presenters:

  • John Laschinger, MD, Medical Officer, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration
  • Jules Mitchel, MBA, PhD, President, Target Health Inc

Webinar Objective:

This webinar covers CTTI's recommendations on conducting clinical trials using registries. Those interested in evaluating or designing a registry for the purposes of conducting clinical trials can learn more about the project’s tools, intended for the following purposes:

  • To determine if an Existing Registry is appropriate for embedding clinical trials
  • To assess if an Existing Registry contains the elements needed to support a clinical trial
  • To design a New Registry suitable for embedding clinical trials

Webinar Resources:

Download the CTTI Registry Trials Recommendations.

*Mentioned during Q&A: Registry of Patient Registries: patientregistry.ahrq.gov/

*CTTI encourages the use of all materials listed on this site in the pursuit of improving the clinical trials enterprise. If you use any of the slides from this presentation, please let us knowcredit CTTI, and make it clear that you are not presenting on behalf of CTTI.

CTTI Paper Discusses Suitability of Patient Registries for Embedded Clinical Trials

Embedding clinical trials into patient registries can lead to high-quality, efficient prospective research. However, methods for assessing which registries are appropriate to serve as the platform for the conduct of a clinical trial can be problematic for researchers. A new CTTI paper in Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science identifies and describes the essential characteristics, processes, and practices required to embed and conduct registry-based clinical trials to support regulatory decision-making.

Taking an evidence-based, collaborative approach, CTTI completed a comprehensive review of registry-embedded clinical trials and worked with the Research Triangle Institute (RTI) to conduct 25 expert interviews. These efforts were followed by a multistakeholder meeting with 42 members of academia, industry, government, and patient advocacy organizations.

The resulting data indicates that registries can create a sustainable and reusable infrastructure to support embedded clinical trials when certain characteristics are present including relevancy, robustness, reliability, and assurance of patient protections.

What’s more, registry-embedded clinical trials offer opportunities to:

  • Identify high-quality sites
  • Reduce duplicative data and site workload
  • Recruit patients efficiently
  • Reduce lost to follow-up incidents
  • Enhance timelines
  • Reduce costs

CTTI noted a prevailing need for guidance on how to assess the suitability of existing registries and plan new registries that can support embedded clinical trials. The paper includes CTTI recommendations, suggested practices, and decision trees that help meet this need. These resources are designed to help clinical trial stakeholders effectively leverage patient registries to create high-quality, embedded clinical trials that benefit relevant patient populations.

New CTTI Recommendations Provide Path for More Efficient Clinical Trials Using Clinical Registries

Registry Trials

CTTI’s newly released recommendations have the potential to streamline clinical trials by using registry information. Registries are data collection tools typically used to better understand long-term trends in a specific population, such as patients with a particular disease or patients exposed to a certain treatment.

“High-quality registries are an increasingly important source of evidence for regulatory decisions and surveillance, conveying important information, for example, regarding real-world medical product use and outcomes throughout the total product lifecycle,” said John Laschinger, MD, of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, who helped lead the CTTI work. “Use of high-quality registries as a vehicle for efficient conduct of randomized clinical trials is a proven concept that can be considered for future pre-market trials,” he added.

If registries are designed appropriately, the “real-world” data within them should often be able to meet the expectations of regulatory agencies, and support decisions about medical products. In this regard, CTTI addresses how to assess data quality, ensure patient protections, and link with other data sources. The recommendations apply to both existing and new registries. Following these best practices can assist in evaluating suitability of registry data for regulatory purposes.

“Conducting randomized clinical trials within registries can increase efficiencies in data collection and decrease site workload, potentially leading to significant cost savings,” said Sunil Rao, MD, principal investigator of the successful randomized registry-based clinical trial, SAFE-PCI for Women.

While the scope of this project was limited to registries, many of the principles and tools in these recommendations have the potential to be applied to using health care systems or other existing data sources, such as those available within claims databases, to facilitate more efficient clinical trials.

More information about these recommendations on conducting clinical trials using registries is available both on the Registry Trials Project page and in a webinar recording.

 

*To view the press release of this announcement, click here.

Registry-Based Clinical Trials: Expert Meeting Materials Now Available

On March 30, 2016, CTTI’s Registry Trials Project held a multi-stakeholder expert meeting to accomplish the following:

  • Identify essential elements of registries needed to successfully embed and conduct registry-based clinical trials
  • Present findings from the project’s literature review and expert interviews
  • Receive feedback on potential benefits of and existing barriers to the use of registries in clinical trials
  • Reach consensus on best practices to increase adoption of clinical trials within registries

The meeting included more than 40 participants from academia, government agencies, industry, and patient representatives. A key takeaway was that a role exists for registries in creating a sustainable infrastructure to conduct regulatory trials, including early development, pre-market, and post-approval investigations. Suggestions were generated around considerations including data quality, regulatory issues, governance, and registry design. Input from the meeting, along with evidence gathered through the CTTI project, will be used to develop recommendations and tools to increase the value, acceptance, and success of registry-based clinical trials.

CLICK HERE to access the meeting summary, slides, agenda, and other materials.

A Brave New World: Registry-Based Clinical Trials

MARCH 30, 2016

CTTI Project: Registry Trials

Meeting Objectives

  • Identify essential elements of registries needed to successfully embed and conduct registry-based clinical trials
  • Present findings from CTTI’s Registry Trials Project: Literature Review and Expert Interviews
  • Receive feedback on potential benefits of and existing barriers to the use of registries in clinical trials
  • Reach consensus on best practices to increase adoption of clinical trials within registries

Meeting Location:

DoubleTree Silver Spring Hotel by Hilton, 8727 Colesville Road, Silver Spring, MD 20910

The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated.

CTTI Tackles 3 Issues in Clinical Trials with New Projects

At CTTI, we are continuously looking for practices that will increase the quality and efficiency of clinical trials. In 2014, three new topics have been added to our portfolio:

  1. Conducting Trials Using Data Registries: Demographic, disease, and outcome data collected in clinical observational registries often overlap with data gathered for clinical trials. Integrating clinical trials within observational data registries may offer opportunities to avoid duplicative data collection and increase efficiency while decreasing clinical trial costs. Objectives for this project include identifying upfront costs and operational adjustments required to utilize a data registry for a clinical trial, as well as recommending best practices for conducting randomized registry trials.
  2. Data Monitoring Committees (DMCs): As the use of DMCs has increased and evolved over the past 40 years, critical issues have emerged. A few of these issues include differences in DMC roles and responsibilities, which contributes to confusion and unclear expectations, as well as a lack of a clear plan for preparing the next generation of DMC members. Objectives for this project include understanding the current landscape of DMC use and conduct, clarifying the purpose of and rationale for using a DMC, and describing effective communication practices between independent DMCs and other trial stakeholders.
  3. Investigator Turnover: While an enormous amount of time and resources are spent initiating new investigators into the clinical trial process, there continues to be a high turnover rate for investigators. As many as 40% of investigators annually choose not to participate in another FDA-regulated trial. This high rate of attrition impacts site and overall trial performance. Objectives for this project include obtaining a more thorough understanding of the factors that influence investigators’ decisions to leave the clinical research practice, as well as defining the impact of investigator turnover on industry and society.