Use of Central IRBs for Multi-center Clinical Trials

APRIL 25, 2012 TO APRIL 26, 2012

CTTI Project: Single IRB

Meeting Background:

The willingness of institutions to defer full local institutional review board (IRB) review and approval to a central IRB in multi-center trials continues to vary, despite a 2006 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance and a more recent endorsement by the U.S. Office for Human Research Protections recommending this approach. The goal of the CTTI project is to identify potential solutions to address barriers to the adoption of central IRBs for multi-center clinical trials.

Meeting Objectives:

  • Present research findings from the CTTI project entitled, Use of Central IRBs for Multi-center Clinical Trials
  • Discuss research findings among experts present at the meeting
  • Solicit additional feedback to refine proposed solutions

Meeting Location:

Hilton Washington DC/Rockville Executive Meeting Center, Rockville, MD

Meeting Materials:

Meeting Summary

Meeting Agenda

List of meeting attendees

*The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated.

The Use of Antibacterial Drugs Developed via Streamlined Approaches for Serious Infections Where There is Unmet Need: Understanding Patient and Physician Perspectives and Considerations to Take Forward

MARCH 01, 2016

CTTI Project: Unmet Need

Meeting Objectives

  • Present perspectives from patients, caregivers and physicians on antibacterial drugs developed using streamlined approaches
  • Identify focus group themes and discuss topics which should be further explored or where draft recommendations could be made
  • Obtain feedback to improve labeling, risk communication, public understanding and stewardship

Meeting Location:

Sheraton Silver Spring Hotel, Silver Spring, MD

The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated.

Statistical Issues Think Tank II

NOVEMBER 19, 2014

CTTI Project: Unmet Need

Meeting Objectives

  • To provide an update on the current status of statistical methodologies for the design and analysis of antibacterial drugs
  • To discuss ongoing challenges in the development and adoption of innovative methods
  • To generate strategies to propel antibacterial drug development forward.

Meeting Location:

Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center, Bethesda, MD

Meeting Presentations:

Session 1: Current status of drug development and ongoing challenges

Session 2: Current research and additional opportunities for the future

The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated.

Expert Meeting: IND Safety Assessment and Communication

FEBRUARY 28, 2012 TO FEBRUARY 29, 2012

CTTI Project: Safety Reporting

Meeting Background:

Since its inception, the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) has had an interest in improving the quality and efficiency of safety reporting for serious adverse events (SAE) in studies performed under investigational new drug applications (INDs). CTTI’s first project on this topic focused on expedited safety reporting of serious, unexpected and possibly related SAEs to site investigators in multi-center trials. At the project’s conclusion, CTTI recommended that sponsors decrease the volume of uninterpretable and irrelevant safety reports to investigators, and instead supply investigators with meaningful reports that would improve investigators’ understanding of a drug’s benefit-risk profile. These recommendations were developed immediately prior to the FDA issuing a new final rule on safety reporting for drugs being studied under INDs.

FDA’s new IND safety reporting rule, published in the Federal Register on September 29, 2010, became effective on March 28, 2011. The intent of the new rule is to improve the quality of safety reports by minimizing the number of uninterpretable reports that sponsors submit to FDA and investigators. This is consistent with CTTI’s recommendations described above. However, CTTI members have expressed concern that there may be some uncertainty about the best methods to implement the new rule. For this reason, CTTI formed a new project entitled “IND Safety Assessment and Communication,” with the goal of promoting responsible oversight of safety for pre-market drug products consistent with the intent of the FDA’s new IND safety rule. The project objectives are as follows:

  • To obtain a deeper understanding of sponsors’ current practices for assessing safety of a pre-market drug product across all trials and sources of safety information and for communicating potential safety signals
  • To facilitate an informed discussion of practices and challenges in assessing and communicating IND safety information
  • To issue recommendations for future approaches that will support the intent of the IND safety reporting rule effective March 2011

The project team first surveyed industry sponsors to obtain a deeper understanding of their current practices. CTTI then distributed anonymized survey results to a group of experts that included representatives from each sponsor organization that completed the survey, government (NIH, Department of Veterans’ Affairs, and FDA), academia, and patient advocacy. These experts participated in a meeting convened on February 28-29, 2012 in Bethesda, MD. A subgroup of attendees at this meeting were members of a biostatistics workgroup that the CTTI project team formed to advise on the methodological dilemmas related to implementing the new IND Safety Reporting rule.

Meeting Objectives:

  • Findings from the survey of sponsor practices
  • Companies’ strategies for implementing the new IND safety reporting rule
  • Challenges in implementing the new rule

Meeting Location:

Bethesda, Maryland

Expert Meeting: Adverse Event Reporting

OCTOBER 03, 2010 TO OCTOBER 04, 2010

CTTI Project: Safety Reporting

Meeting Background:

The key objectives of this expert meeting included:

  • Discuss and integrate empirical findings from all components of this project
  • Consider implications of the FDA’s new safety regulations
  • Develop a set of recommendations for optimal reporting of unexpected serious adverse events to investigators that will improve human subject protection

Meeting Location:

Marriott Inn & Conference Center, Hyattsville, MD

Meeting Presentations:

Day 1

Day 2

Meeting Results:

On September 29, 2010—just prior to the expert meeting—the FDA issued a new final rule and accompanying draft guidance concerning IND safety reporting. The requirements of the new safety rule, which went into effect on March 28, 2011, affected interpretation of the project findings described above. Meeting participants acknowledged that the new FDA rule marked a major step forward in recognizing that little knowledge can be gained from an individual event. Participants also agreed that inundating investigators with such data is inefficient and ineffective and that the FDA rule and guidance hold promise for helping to eliminate this burden on investigators. The discussion revealed, however, that implementation of the rule could pose challenges that may only be resolved through the concerted educational efforts and international harmonization of regulatory expectations.

The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated.

Expert Meeting: CTTI IND Safety Advancement Project

JULY 21, 2015 TO JULY 22, 2015

CTTI Project: Safety Reporting

Meeting Objectives

  • Present findings and conclusions from the project evidence gathering activities
  • Discuss opportunities for improving the efficiency and value of the expedited IND safety reporting process
  • Understand opportunities for educating stakeholders on expedited IND safety reporting best practices

Meeting Location:

DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Washington, D.C., Silver Spring, MD

Meeting Presentations:

Click here to view the presentation slides from this meeting.

The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated.

CTTI Data Monitoring Committees Project Expert Meeting

JULY 28, 2015 TO JULY 29, 2015

CTTI Project: Data Monitoring Committees (DMCs)

Meeting Objectives

  • Present findings and conclusions from the project survey and focus groups
  • Share and solicit feedback on proposed Data Monitoring Committees (DMCs) recommendations

Meeting Location:

DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Washington, D.C., Silver Spring, MD

Meeting Presentations:

Click here to view the presentation slides from this meeting.

The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated.

CTTI Informed Consent Project Expert Meeting

MARCH 10, 2015 TO MARCH 11, 2015

CTTI Project: Informed Consent

Meeting Objectives

  • Present findings and conclusions from the project literature review and expert interview series
  • Solicit feedback and develop consensus on proposed recommendations to enhance the informed consent process

Meeting Location:

DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Washington DC, Silver Spring, MD

The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated.

Are You Ready for Mandated Single IRB Review for Multicenter Clinical Trials?

NOVEMBER 14, 2017

CTTI Project: Single IRB

Meeting Objectives:

  • Review upcoming NIH policy and Common Rule changes regarding single IRB review as well as existing FDA Guidance on Centralized IRB Review Process in Multicenter Clinical Trials.
  • Discuss the remaining gaps in knowledge, guidance and tools for implementing a single IRB review model.
  • Propose solutions regarding implementation of single IRB model for federally funded (e.g., NIH-sponsored), and for FDA-regulated drug and device, multicenter clinical studies.

Meeting Location:

DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Silver Spring, 8727 Colesville Rd., Silver Spring, MD

The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated.

CTTI Antibacterial Drug Development: Statistical Issues Think Tank Meeting

AUGUST 20, 2012

CTTI Project: Unmet Need

Meeting Background:

A CTTI-hosted Statistical Issues Think Tank Meeting was convened to provide an opportunity for leading experts in clinical trial methodologies to discuss alternative approaches to design and analysis that may be useful for antibacterial drug development programs.

Meeting Location:

Bethesda Hyatt Regency, Bethesda, MD

Meeting Presentation:

CTTI Statistics Think Tank for Anti-Bacterial Drug Development by Lisa LaVange

Resulting Publications:

1) Hierarchical nested trial design (HNTD) for demonstrating treatment efficacy of new antibacterial drugs in patient populations with emerging bacterial resistance

On June 23, 2014, Statistics in Medicine published an article by Huque et al. that describes a novel clinical trial model to address the increased prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. This paper resulted from the CTTI-hosted Statistical Issues Think Tank Meeting that author Mohammad Huque attended.

2) The Role of Statistics in Regulatory Decision Making

In February, 2014, this peer-reviewed article was published in Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. This paper resulted from the CTTI-hosted Statistical Issues Think Tank Meeting where author Lisa M. LaVange, PhD, attended and presented. In this publication, LaVange concludes:

This article presents the author’s view of the important role that statisticians play in regulatory decision making, beginning with a broad overview of current office initiatives, including the development of guidance documents and a recent push for open and transparent collaboration with industry on methods development. Several recent examples are provided to illustrate the impact that statisticians can have on regulatory decisions through the use of strategic quantitative thinking. Also discussed are areas where it is believed that innovative statistical solutions or greater clarity on existing approaches is still needed.

3) Bayesian approach to the design and analysis of non-inferiority trials for anti-infective products

On August 5, 2013, the Journal of Pharmaceutical Statistics published an article by Gamalo et al. that describes a Bayesian approach for the design and analysis of active comparator trials used in the development and market approval of antibacterial drugs. This work was presented in part at the CTTI-hosted Statistical Issues Think Tank Meeting.

“The CTTI Statistics Think Tank, a collaborative initiative with the FDA/CDER Anti-Bacterial Drug Development Task Force, was held in August, 2012 and provided an excellent opportunity for leading statisticians from academia, government, and industry to discuss innovative approaches for accelerating the development of new antibiotics. This article presents a comprehensive Bayesian approach to non-inferiority trials and represents but one of several approaches that were discussed at the Statistics Think Tank meeting. We look forward to additional research being published from the ideas generated at that meeting.” said Lisa LaVange Director of Biostatistics, Food and Drug Administration.

The Bayesian approach may allow for use of information from sources that include observational studies and early phase trials on the effect of the active comparator for study design. This approach may aid in reducing large sample size requirements and decrease study durations for antibacterial agents that enter late-stage clinical development.

The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated.