CTTI Project: Diversity
CTTI Project: Registry Trials
Download Slides (653.36 KB)
This webinar covers CTTI's recommendations on conducting clinical trials using registries. Those interested in evaluating or designing a registry for the purposes of conducting clinical trials can learn more about the project’s tools, intended for the following purposes:
Download the CTTI Registry Trials Recommendations.
*Mentioned during Q&A: Registry of Patient Registries: patientregistry.ahrq.gov/
*CTTI encourages the use of all materials listed on this site in the pursuit of improving the clinical trials enterprise. If you use any of the slides from this presentation, please let us know, credit CTTI, and make it clear that you are not presenting on behalf of CTTI.
CTTI Project: Clinical Trials Issues Related to COVID-19
CTTI Project: Safety Reporting
*The views and opinions expressed in this video are those of the speaker and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of CTTI.
Are you confused about how best to comply with the FDA final rule on IND safety reporting? Would you like to hear more about how to handle common, yet challenging, safety reporting situations? Do you know someone who is interested?
This webinar is hosted by CTTI's IND Safety Advancement Project Team and is the first in a CTTI-hosted series designed to explore challenging safety reporting scenarios using case studies.
CTTI Project: State of Clinical Trials
Dr. Califf, who served as an original co-chair of CTTI and was instrumental in its creation, is a prominent cardiologist and clinical researcher whose career as a physician, teacher, researcher, and regulator spans more than three decades. Dr. Califf has provided leadership for numerous high-impact clinical trials and has been at the forefront of innovation in clinical research methods.
During this webinar, Dr. Robert Califf, former Commissioner of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Fortin Professor of Cardiology at the Duke University School of Medicine, examined the current state of the clinical trials enterprise. Specifically, he addressed recent developments that have major implications for the clinical research enterprise in the United States, including the opportunities enabled by growing access to digital sources of data, the increasing importance of patient-reported outcomes, and the power of patient engagement in reshaping approaches to clinical research. As the recent head of FDA, Dr. Califf was directly involved in cross-agency efforts to modernize the national system for conducting clinical research by articulating a large, flexible, and widely shared approach to evidence generation (known as “EvGen”) that could leverage rapidly expanding sources of digital health data to produce high-quality, actionable information for patients and healthcare providers.
A particularly important aspect of these “EvGen” efforts hinges on effectively engaging patients and their advocates as partners in research, particularly as digital technologies and patient-reported outcomes data present new potential for the rapid and seamless acquisition of health data that is truly representative of broad and diverse populations. Ultimately, it is hoped that this new national research infrastructure will enable more rapid, representative, affordable, and generalizable clinical trials that can provide the high-quality evidence to enable a true learning health system. Many of these activities draw upon insights that were developed through pioneering investigations sponsored by CTTI, whose efforts will continue to shape national approaches to the creation and implementation medical knowledge.
CTTI Project: Quality by Design
Resources:
Topics Included: Innovative Trials
SHARE TO:
Implementing less rigid, more flexible approaches to clinical trials can increase patient and site access to research, improve participant satisfaction, facilitate real-world data use, enroll more diverse patient populations, and enable more generalizable trial results. Ultimately, these flexible trial approaches help sponsors bring new therapies to patients faster. However, despite their numerous advantages, questions remain about how to maintain data quality when adopting these strategies. High-quality trial data must be fit-for-purpose, credible, and reliable to support regulatory decision-making without jeopardizing participant safety or the integrity of trial results.
To address these questions, CTTI has started a new project to gather diverse perspectives on the advantages and disadvantages of flexible trial approaches. This includes methods such as embedding trials in clinical practice, incorporating decentralized trial elements, and allowing for setting adjustments during trial participation. Through multi-partner roundtable discussions, in-depth interviews, and surveys, CTTI will identify critical concerns and considerations for maintaining data quality when using flexible trial approaches. CTTI will outline case examples of flexible approaches in trials, identify common themes and responses from partners around these case examples, and consider a toolbox that outlines the strengths of implementing flexible approaches and provides recommendations for how to maintain data quality when incorporating them.
Pamela Tenaerts, CTTI project team lead and representative from Medable, emphasized the potential of flexible methodologies, stating, “Embracing more flexible methodologies for data collection enables us to better represent the populations we’re looking to serve while providing a better experience for participants.”
CTTI’s work in this area will help to increase the use of flexible approaches in clinical trials, resulting in improved trial access, participant satisfaction, enrollment of diverse patient populations, and trial efficiency.
Topics Included: Data Collecting and Reporting, Ensuring Quality, Innovative Trials, Patient Engagement, Recruitment, Regulatory Submissions + Approvals, Safety, Site Planning
SHARE TO:
The recording for the hybrid public workshop on AI in Drug and Biological Product Development convened and hosted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI), held August 6, is now available. Over 9,000 registrants from diverse backgrounds and perspectives joined to explore the responsible use of AI in drug development.
During the workshop, we learned from experts as they discussed guiding principles for the responsible use of AI in the development of safe, effective, and high-quality drugs. Drawing on real case examples, experts discussed their rationale for particular approaches, shared their methods for evaluating success, recounted challenges and obstacles, explored options for scaling and wider applicability, and outlined considerations for moving forward. Presentations can also be found here.
Topics Included: Data Collecting and Reporting, Innovative Trials, Site Planning
SHARE TO:
The FDA recently issued new guidance titled “Integrating Randomized Controlled Trials for Drug and Biological Products Into Routine Clinical Practice Guidance for Industry.” Those looking to put concepts from the guidance into action will find a range of valuable resources in CTTI’s Trials in Clinical Practice Toolkit. From recommendations and a site feasibility tool to case examples, these resources provide organizations and individuals with actionable operational and trial design considerations noted in the guidance.
CTTI Senior Project Manager Lindsay Kehoe provides further insight in the recent Clinical Leader article, “Putting It Into Practice: Why We Need Embedded Clinical Trials,” highlighting the need to incorporate elements like randomization and informed consent from trials into clinical practice to bridge the gap between research and practice. She underscores the potential for this integration to lead to a boost in knowledge, reduction in duplication of resources, and ultimately, enhanced patient care. Kehoe suggests that integration of trial elements is not all or none, benefits can be seen regardless of their number, and emphasizes the need for data to be relevant and reliable. She concludes that the success of this integration hinges on several factors: access to appropriate data, alignment of trial design with clinical workflow, preparedness of sites, clear accountability, and increased awareness of the value of research.
The new guidance also emphasizes following a Quality by Design approach to streamline trials and proactively address risks of important errors. CTTI has developed a comprehensive Quality by Design toolkit, including recommendations, a principles document, and various resources that can help support implementation.
More information about CTTI’s Trials in Clinical Practice & Quality by Design work is available on CTTI’s website.
