Stakeholders from industry, academia, government, and patient groups met to identify areas in need of improvement in HABP/VABP protocols: the protocol design, the informed consent process (to address decisional impairment), use of a single IRB of record, and trial outcomes and endpoints. At expert meetings, stakeholders discussed best practices for defining the enrollment criteria, testing new diagnostics, obtaining informed consent from seriously ill patients, selecting an IRB, and pre-specifying trial endpoints in the protocol. Stakeholders also agreed that safety data collection in the HABP/VABP patient population is challenging and burdensome due to the large number of medical procedures, adverse events, and concomitant medications involved. Additional challenges include protocol complexity and the lack of harmonization in U.S. and EU regulations regarding the conduct of HABP/VABP trials. Expert meeting attendees agreed that utilizing a QbD approach to protocol elements and trial planning is critical to facilitate streamlining of data collection and recording.
Based on this work, CTTI released recommendations for Streamlining Protocol Elements and for Optimizing Operational Efficiency for Safety Data Collection HABP VABP Trials. The recommendations appeared as part of a peer-reviewed supplement in Clinical Infectious Diseases that featured collaborative and innovative approaches by CTTI and others to address challenges associated with HABP/VABP trials.
A part of the Streamlining HABP/VABP project, a working group including key experts, such as infectious diseases and pulmonary/critical care medicine experts, those experienced in designing clinical studies, and patient representatives, was convened to identify a network of sites for future studies. CTTI partnered with the Innovative Medicines Initiative’s Combacte program and their CLIN-net site network to expand the site list. The U.S. and European sites were used for the Risk Factors for HABP/VABP Study.